Tuesday, December 27, 2011

The Near Impossibility of President Ron Paul

Now the rest of the GOP field has peaked too early, people are adopting that predictable position - through nothing more meaningful than a crude process of elimination - that maybe the Republican nomination is Ron Paul's for the taking. This I doubt; what I find even more doubtful is that Paul would be a credible contender in a straight contest with Obama.

Before I explain why, let me explain my own thoughts on Paul. Yeah, he's dead right on some things - and I've been very impressed with his reasoned and non-bellicose approach to foreign policy, which is a great thing coming from a (nominal) Republican. I have little time, though, for his anti-abortion stance or for his apparent god-bothering. But hey ho. No candidate is perfect, and he's the best of a truly atrocious bunch. So while I wouldn't go so far as to say I want him to win - such passion over a deeply predictable contest that I will not be able to vote in strikes me as utterly pointless - but I suppose I would prefer him to. So why am I so dismissive of his chances?

Well, quite simply (and really rather obviously) what I want does not impact on reality in any meaningful way. Reality does not conform to my wishes. And the reality is that the deck is stacked against Paul to a massive extent. He is unlikely to win the nomination for his party, since even if he does win some early upset victories then the Republican establishment will intervene in favour of a much more mainstream and middle of the road candidate. I reckon there will be a replay of the 2004 Democrat primary campaign, where the genuinely interesting (although possibly a little barmy) Howard Dean was swiftly marginalised by the much more pedestrian yet mainstream John Kerry. The nomination will probably be Romney's; he's a safe pair of hands who will not damage the party too much even as he hands victory to Obama.

But suppose Paul did get the nomination - what then? Well, Obama would crush him. The Democrat electioneering machine would spend all of its time telling the American people that Paul is some sort of dangerous radical who would leave innocent people to get ill and die without health insurance. Hell, they could even outflank on the issue of security. Yeah, those charges might be false, but so what? Since when have presidential elections been about taking the high road? The Obama campaign would do everything they possible could to make Paul into a Goldwater for the new millennium, while simultaneously painting their guy to be solid, dependable and statesmanlike for the cameras.

Perhaps a truly great communicator could make libertarian ideals appeal to the American masses; the problem is that great communicator is not Ron Paul. Sure, he manages to avoid sticking his foot in his mouth most of the time, but that is not enough to win enough Americans over to what is potentially a radical realignment of the nature of government and state in their country. Plus, he's up against Obama, whose pompous speaking style manages to add gravitas to even the most anodyne and meaningless of pronouncements. Again, yeah, you can argue that this is unfair, but it is also reality. A Ron Paul presidential campaign might be enough to provoke a misled American people into handing a reluctant landslide to Obama.

Paul's best hope for next year is that his stance and policies in some way influence the Republican programme; in other words, that the long process of explaining his version of libertarianism begins. Then the next time a libertarian runs for the Republican nomination, these ideas are more mainstream and people are more likely to understand them and get behind them. It could be enough to get a Republican libertarian nominee in 2016 or 2020. It will certainly help to wrest control of that party away from the Christian fundamentalist path that Bush Junior put it on. But President Paul remains deeply unlikely to the point where it is basically an impossibility. It might comfort some libertarians on both sides of the Atlantic to pretend otherwise, but unfortunately it remains a pipe dream that helps them to escape from a political reality that remains stubbornly immune to the penetration of libertarian ideals into the political mainstream.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, May 16, 2011

Donald Trump; Definitely Not Going To Be President

Apparently, Donald Trump wants to spend more time with his business interests rather than running for US President. I rather suspect, though, that his main concern (despite protestations to the contrary) is the fear of losing. After all, he's a brand - and an ignominious defeat to someone like Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney in the Republican primaries would damage that brand. As well as potentially damaging his colossal ego. Because he would never have made it all the way to being the nominee, and therefore the man Obama will defeat next year. He was not, and will never be, a credible candidate for the highest office in the US.

But Trump isn't the only one to opt of the race to be beaten by Obama - the ever idiotic Mike Huckabee has said "all the factors say go, but my heart says no." Whatever the fuck that might mean. As far as I can see, rather like Trump, what he actually means is that the factors are really saying no. He knows he would lose (again) if he decided to run. Wouldn't win the general election. Mainly because he wouldn't even make it to being the nominee. Last time, he lost to a grumpy old man. This time, who knows who he would lose to? The only guarantee would be that he would lose...

Of course, all of this reduces the field of potential Republican nominees. And actually makes it much less mental. Now all we need is for Sarah Palin to say she's not running and we might end up with a field of sane, if rather dull, people vying for the nomination. Which probably won't lead to a Republican President come 2013, but will also mean that the party of Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan hasn't been completely captured by its loopy, extremist elements.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, May 01, 2011

Mitt Romney - Republican Front-Runner?

You know, with regard to the Republican nomination for next year’s presidential election, I keep on hearing the name Mitt Romney being mentioned as the frontrunner. And for the life of me, I can’t work out why.

Part of the reason is that Mitt Romney is not an inspiring candidate. In fact, when I think of the name Mitt Romney, all I can think of is the man who strapped a dog to the roof of his car before setting off on a long journey. And that sort of thing doesn’t immediately make me think “oh, he’d be a good president”. Or a credible candidate for the presidency.

Of course, he’s far saner than some of the other potential candidates – and yes, I’m talking about Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee here. He might be dull, insipid and uninspiring (with a penchant for unintentional [?] animal cruelty, but at least he looks and sounds like a credible (if deeply boring) candidate for the presidency. Which maybe why, given his track record of failure when seeking the Republican nomination, he has become the frontrunner.

There’s a precedent for this, of course. A US political party faces the prospect of having to run a presidential campaign with someone far away from the centre ground. Therefore, they take action, and the establishment moves to embrace a much more mainstream candidate. It happened to the Democrats, for example, in 2004, when the more radical Howard Dean (who, for a long-time seemed destined to be the nominee) was replaced by the much more mainstream (and much more pedestrian) John Kerry.

Which is the point – if nominated, Mitt Romney will be the Republican’s answer to John Kerry. And we all know how John Kerry’s bid for the presidency ended

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, November 28, 2009

It seems appropriate somehow that in a pie chart that adds up to 193% the winning candidate is Sarah Palin...

Via Mr E.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

What if... McCain had been elected President in 2000 rather than Bush?

Today is a remarkable day for a remarkable man: today, Barack Obama will become the first black President of the United States of America. But it is also an important day for another remarkable man – for today, after eight turbulent years in power, President John McCain is standing down and heading back to Arizona.

McCain is a man who has both powerfully and controversially dominated the political landscape of the USA for the best part of a decade. Despite governing resolutely from the centre ground, his out-spoken views and his professed desire to govern from both the head and the heart have meant that, for everyone lamenting the end of his time in the White House, there is another person celebrating – not least those in his own party.

And, lest we forget, it could all have been so different. Had McCain not won the South Carolina primary in 2000, then he would have struggled to win the Republican nomination from the favourite candidate, George W Bush. And winning that nomination enabled him to fight an energetic Presidential campaign later in 2000, and snatch victory from the heir apparent to the White House, Al Gore. History would be very different had Gore, or even Bush, become President.

McCain’s success in winning the Presidential Election in 2000 should not be under-estimated. Bush Junior had the firepower, the money, and the family name to win the nomination. Bush’s campaign also had no compunction about fighting dirty. Yet McCain, with his desire for “straight-talking” and his obvious relish for the underdog status, captured the public imagination, and with it, the Republican nomination.

Even then, his victory at the national polls looked far from assured. He trailed Gore in the polls, despite uniting the party by making George W Bush his running mate. However, his honest and enthusiastic manner, which undermined the cruel jibes about his age, meant he soon started to win over the nation as a whole. His real triumph came in the debates, when his warm, open speaking style brought into sharp relief the much more stilted and intellectual approach of Al Gore. It is one of the lasting debates surrounding the 2000 Presidential Election – whether McCain won it or whether Gore’s lacklustre campaign lost it. But the remarkable political rise of John McCain was completed on Election Night when Florida fell into his column and with it, the White House.

The First Term

Yet, once president-elect, McCain seemed to lose his way and with it his identity. He remained resolutely in the centre ground, leading many in his own party to comment that they seemed to have accidentally elected Al Gore rather than a Republican. His Inauguration speech in 2001 was poor, filled with truisms about more honest government delivered by a old man visibly shivering against the cold. During his first few months in power, the now President McCain seemed to be lost, offering few initiatives and appearing to treat water in the White House. Some wondered whether McCain was actually up to the job of President.

All this changed in September 11th, 2001. McCain’s angry, defiant call to arms after the planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, as well as the plane brought down by its own passengers, showed a confident leader rising to the challenge. Despite the advice of the Secret Service, and the danger involved in going into a disaster area, he was in New York City within hours of the atrocity – talking to survivors, and making sure that the rescue attempts and investigations were being co-ordinated effectively across the country.

After it became clear that Al-Qaeda was behind the attacks, McCain was quick to work on a response. Through diplomacy he was able to get troops on the ground in Pakistan – with the blessing of the government of Pakistan. However, the Taliban regime in Afghanistan proved to be more difficult, and as they refused to hand over bin Laden, McCain worked hard to bring together an international coalition to deal with the problem. With UN backing, McCain ordered the attack on Afghanistan.

The Afghan war is probably the most divisive part of McCain’s legacy. Whilst the out-going President remains defiant over his decision to invade, US troops are still fighting in Afghanistan, with no sign of bin Laden or an end to hostilities. For every patriot who praises McCain for his tough stance in Afghanistan, there is a peace lover calling for the return of US troops. McCain has gone on record as arguing that the death toll could have been worse, had he listened to the hawks in his administration. Nonetheless, the US occupation of Afghanistan remains a poisoned chalice for incoming President Obama.

McCain also showed himself to be a tough fighter when it came national politics as well. He was scathing of the failings of both the CIA and the FBI in the run up to 9/11, eventually replacing the directors of both. He also fought hard to introduce new accounting laws after the collapse of both Enron and Worldcom, controversially (in his own party) putting big business on warning that any fraudulent directors would be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Perhaps the most surprising, and interesting, aspects of McCain’s first term in power was the relationship he had with his Vice-President, George W Bush. Bush was a hawk within the administration, and on several occasions broke ranks with his President to call for a War on Terror on Iraq. McCain steadfastly refused to countenance such a step, arguing that whilst there was some evidence that Iraq was sponsoring terrorism and that a regime change would be a good thing, there was no real evidence that Iraq was connected with 9/11. As the first term went on, though, it became very clear that there was little love lost between President and Vice-President.

As the 2004 election drew near, few thought that there was any real danger of McCain not securing the nomination again. And, indeed, that proved to be the case. However, as soon as it became clear that he would not be opposed in running for the nomination, McCain announced that he would not be running again with George W Bush. The Bush camp was enraged, but it was too late for them to oppose McCain. However the move threatened to destroy Republican unity just before an election. Some speculated that McCain was about to announce he would run as an independent. However, the President had another trick up his sleeve. He announced Joe Lieberman, Gore’s Vice-Presidential candidate, as his running mate. The selection electrified the political seen as it was genuinely a cross-party ticket. It also proved to be a strong political move for the election, despite the problems it created in his second term. It stole all the glory from John Kerry’s campaign, and redefined the McCain administration as centre-of-the-road politically. Whilst McCain may have lost some votes from the Christian Right of the party, he gained them from the Democratic Party.

In the event, the 2004 election was something of an anti-climax. John Kerry never stopped training in the polls, and as one of his team pointed out, he was simply the wrong candidate in the wrong place at the wrong time: “We were running a Vietnam war hero against an even more heroic Vet, running an experienced Senator against an experienced Senator and President, running with a centrist candidate against a President who had taken on one of our own as his candidate.” In the end, the result was a foregone conclusion: McCain won in a landslide.

The Second Term

McCain won further plaudits after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans. He put troops on the ground and ploughed money into the rescue efforts, leading some to claim that he saved hundreds of lives. His independent investigation into the disaster recommended millions should be ploughed into flood defences; something which McCain was happy to do. But despite his successes here, his Presidency was increasingly being undermined by his own party.

Many were unhappy with his decision to dump Bush and take on a Democrat; this was not helped by several on-the-record, scathing remarks about various Republicans suffering corruption scandals. Events reached a head when a group of Republicans attempted to have McCain expelled from the Republican party. McCain laughed off the attempts and they came to nothing. Nonetheless, McCain appeared increasingly isolated from his own party, and declined to do too much active campaigning for his own party in the 2006 mid-terms. The loss of the control of Congress to the Democrats hurt McCain, and he became increasingly reliant on his Vice-President to liase with the Congress.

He was also hurt as the economy began to freefall. In contrast to his prompt action in the face of both 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, McCain seemed to struggle to find a path to deal with the economy. He was also hurt by Lieberman’s decision not to stand, and watched with mounting horror as the Republican party fell into a bitter fight between the moderates under Mitt Romney and the Republican Christian Right under Mike Huckabee. In the end, the moderates won through, with Romney as the Republican candidate and little-known Alaskan governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. But as the economy collapsed, and leading a party torn apart by infighting, a resurgent Democratic Party, headed by Barack Obama, won the election comfortably.

In his most recent interview, McCain candidly described his years in the White House as “six of the most challenging, and rewarding years you could ever hope for, followed by two of the most challenging and depressing you could ever dream of.” He appears now as a tired man, looking forward to retirement. Time will tell how his time as President is truly judged; but he leaves behind a mixed legacy and has lead the USA through a roller coaster eight years.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, February 08, 2008

ABH: Anyone But Huckabee

Mitt Romney has suspended his campaign for the White House. Interesting language, that – "suspended". Almost as if he is giving it all a short break, and will resume fighting for the nomination sometime next week. Anyway, he’s out of it. What did for Mitt? Probably his strangely egregious campaign (nicely spoofed here) which consisted of funding adverts from his own fortune that attacked his opponents without really advocating himself.

We are now in the curious, and worrying, position where there are only two people in the Republican primary season who have won states – John McCain, and Mike Huckabee. It is the latter name that is so worrying. Now, I’ve banged on enough about the problems of Huckabee, and why he appears to me to be utterly demented. But the terrifying thing is he still has a shot at the presidency, and (failing that) the vice-presidency.

So I’m starting a campaign: ABH*. Anybody But Huckabee.

The objectives are simple – to send two key messages across the Atlantic:

1. To the Republicans – stop voting for Huckabee. Seriously, just stop it! It is not big, it is not clever, and if Huckabee ever got into the White House, then the US will have no friends.

2. To John McCain – It may be politically expedient to offer a space on your ticket to Huckabee, but the fact that it is politically expedient doesn't make it right. Stand by your principles (I'm assuming he has some, I know) and consign this daft, ignorant man to the dustbin of history.

Join me, friends, enemies, Americans - join me in trying to stop this man who makes Mahmoud Ahmadinejad looks like a sensible moderate getting anywhere near the White House.

*Which can also stand for Actual Bodily Harm, natch.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Michigan, 2008

Over in the US, Mitt Romney has managed to resurrect his campaign for the presidency. I could say the race is now open, but frankly you’ll have heard it all before. And if you haven’t, then there are plenty of news websites out there who will force feed you the necessary meaningless and inconclusive speculation that is floating around in this US election year.

However, look at the breakdown of the results in the Republican field. Something interesting is happening.

Iowa:

Huckabee: 34.3%
Romney: 25.3%
Thomson: 13.4%
McCain: 13.1%
Paul: 10%
Giuliani: 3.5%

New Hampshire:

Romney: 32%
Huckabee: 11%
Giuliani: 9%
Paul: 8%
Thompson: 1%
Hunter: 0%

Michigan:

Mitt Romney: 39%
John McCain: 30%
Mike Huckabee: 16%
Ron Paul: 6%
Fred Thompson: 4%
Rudy Giuliani: 3%

Yeah, there is no clear front runner. Yeah, Giuliani and Thompson haven’t scored squat yet, but they haven’t started to contest the races either. But what you may notice is that Ron Paul is consistently scoring between 5-10% in the primaries.

Why does this matter? I mean, he’s not going to win the nomination, is he?

Well, it matters for three reasons. Firstly, Paul isn’t a typical Republican. He is a Libertarian, and detached from the political mainstream. However this detachment has not stopped him scoring respectably in these primaries. Yeah, he ain’t going to be President come November, but the results show a desire – even with the relatively conservative Republican party – for an alternative to the political mainstream. And that desire – after a few decent results this year, could grow. This is music to the ears of anyone like me, who is sick of the political mainstream that is dominating Western politics.

Also, it shows the commitment of Paul’s supporters that he is still scoring higher than Thompson and Giulaini in some states. His supporters must know that the chances of him being nominated are the square root of bugger all. Yet they still cast their votes for him. Arguably he has a stronger bed rock of supporters than either Giuliani or Thompson, as Paul’s supporters stick with him.

And finally, Paul is starting to pick up delegates for the nominating convention. If he continues as he is doing at the moment, he will have some influence over who gets the nod at that convention, particularly if the race becomes deadlocked. Two big "ifs", but for a Libertarian candidate to be doing this well in the Republican primary season would have seemed next to impossible a year ago.

Big change starts with small beginnings. And if the Libertarians in the US can build on Paul’s unlikely success, then 2008 could be remembered as one of those small beginnings.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

New Hampshire, 2008

At the end of my last post on the US primary season I noted that "things could still change". I wish I had made more of this to accentuate my wisdom. Because things have changed.

Of course, things could change again. But I am relatively happy that the ludicrous Mike Huckabee and the Pakistan baiting Obama have been kicked, as Cartman would say, "square in the nuts." As a bonus, Mitt "Moron" Romney looks increasingly fucked. And not in the good way.
Sure, the alternative choices - a decrepit old man and a screaming harridan - are not exactly great, but at least they have some valuble experience and don't make policy decisions based exclusively on the supposed teachings of a fictional being.

No doubt people will get bored of me saying this, just as they will rapidly grow bored of the interminable US election, but this is not the election for the US to elect a Christian fundamentalist or an inexperienced senator, however great the narrative around that candidate is. As dull as it sounds, the US needs a safe pair of hands. Be it Clinton, be it McCain, be it Guiliani. None of those candidates are perfect, but they are one fuck of a lot better than the bottom of the barrel.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Iowa, 2008

There will be an election in a few days time. Not in Pakistan, it seems, but rather the Iowa caucus in, well, Iowa. For anyone who doesn’t understand the way the US election system works, it must be faintly bemusing to see a small number of US voters going to the polls 11 months before the Presidential Election actually happens. But the Iowa caucus is crucial. And more for the Republicans than for the Democrats.

Those vying for the Democratic nomination this time out are quite middle of the road for their party. On the one hand, you have the experienced but also the charisma vacuum that is Hilary Clinton. And then on the other side you have the audacity of hope but paucity of policy, experience and maturity that comes with Barack Obama. Actually, if you combined the two together, you would probably have a very interesting ticket. Any road, you certainly don’t have anyone as extreme and unelectable as Howard Dean running for the Democrats this time.

The Republicans don’t quite have the same strengths when you review the front runners for their nomination. On the one hand you have the charming but terrifyingly loopy Mike Huckabee. On the other hand you have the charmless and moronic Mitt Romney. Both could be classed as religious fundamentalists, both are shit choices if the US wants to recover from the disaster of the Bush years. Between them, though, they have 32.3% of the Republican votes. Sure, Guiliani is ahead – but is beating Huckabee by just 1 point in some polls. McCain – once the presumptive nominee and the most experienced of all those candidates running – is behind Huckabee and is struggling to better Romney – in some cases he is ahead by just 0.7%, in others he is behind. You could take some comfort in the fact that Guiliani is ahead, but it is worrying that he is not much, much further ahead. And there is always the danger in a caucus or primary of an upset victory – hell, even a victory can be considered not strong enough for a sitting President to continue. Neither Guiliani nor McCain are likely to win an upset victory, and the danger of a loss of momentum (and with it the election) is palpable.

As I’ve mentioned before, this is a crucial election for the US. The electorate will need to decide which moderate candidate is best placed to repair the damage done by the eight terrible years of the Bush administration. And that choice will be far more worthwhile if the electorate can choose between a moderate Republican and a moderate Democrat rather than between a Democrat and a Christian fundamentalist. I’ll be watching the Iowa caucus with a lot of interest and more than a little concern, because those few voters who decide the Republican caucus could be contributing to who will become the most powerful person in the world.

Labels: , , , , , ,