Nudge Off!
The coalition, no doubt as part of the dubious and strangely familiar "New Politics", is looking to control how cigarette manufacturers package their wares. Basically, they want bland packages. For the sake of the children, of course.
To a large extent, this is a case of "what's new?" At least until I read this:
Dr Alan Maryon-Davis, professor of public health at Kings College London, said: "It's a very welcome statement from the health secretary and a good example of how the government can help people choose a healthier way of life by 'nudging' rather than nagging."
"Nudging"? Oh, Sweet Jesus Christ and all the baby orphans. This is not nudging, nor is it nagging. It is something all the more dangerous and illiberal. It is telling private businesses how they can and can't operate on utterly spurious grounds. It isn't about the people and their spawn; it is about the government flexing its muscles and using its power.
And the worst thing? It won't work. Those who like to smoke will continue to do so regardless of the packaging. Those who want to give up will not suddenly stop because their favourite brand of fags are now indistinguishable from all the other brands. And the kids... well, want to stop them smoking? Then enforce the fucking law that already says that kids are not allowed to smoke, rather than restricting freedom further in this country.
This isn't a "nudge"; it's yet another patronising and paternalistic restriction of freedom from a government who - on this most crucial of issues - looks almost indistinguishable from the last one.
3 Comments:
I don't like smelling other people's fag smoke, I've never smoked myself and the activity made my Dad ill. Personally I don't like smoking one bit, by my view is LEAVE SMOKERS ALONE YOU RIGHTEOUS FUCKWITS. I saw an item on BBC about this today - they interviewed a cross section of morons in the street who all seemed to think that placing fag packets in brown paper bags would be effective (very BBC). The studio guests both said that the move would be pointless, much to the chagrin of the presenters.
Who in their right mind would think that his measure would be anything but a pointless waste of time?
These interfering busy bodies don't really understand that smoking by younger people will never reduce until it's no longer a rebellious activity and campaigns like this only serve to increase the appeal. There again, it's not in the interest of well paid lobby groups to actually achieve their aims. Wankers the lot of them.
In Spain, we had the big smoking crackdown. Aside from a public-place ban on smoking with it's endless compromises making it useless, they did something else. They stopped having cigarette machines anywhere where people underage might be able to use them. So, you can no longer buy cigarettes anywhere other than tobacconists and some bars (where children are not allowed in) Furthermore, all cigarette machines had to be remote control activated so you'd have to ask the barman to allow you to buy them. They thought this would render it impossible for kids to buy cigarettes. Did it work? Did it fuck. Kids who want to smoke will always get cigarettes, no matter how hard they are to buy or what colour the packaging is. I know this because I started smoking at 14 when the law in the Uk was 16. I then moved to the states where I managed to keep up my pack a day habit whilst still having 2 years to go til I could legally buy them.
As much as I abhor this nudge politics, the real issue is that it won't work anyway. Why put forward a policy that it is clear won't work?
Brilliant post TNL! I had no idea about this latest shade of authoritarianism. More of that to come, by the looks of it. Minimum price of alcohol, this, and other forms of puritanist, populist steaming barrels of piss to be unloaded onto the British public.
I consider myself rather flexible on economic issues/big state/small state whatever, but it's things like this where there's just no excuse for.
Keep it up TNL!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home