Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Royal engagement bullshit

Helpfully, The Daily Mash has put together a list of the most gushing, fawning tripe written in the aftermath of the announcement of the royal engagement. It is reproduced in full below - be warned, though, dear reader, you'll need a strong stomach to get through it all:
Each and every one us will be deeply affected by the looming royal marriage... (Peter Oborne, Daily Telegraph)

In an important sense, this betrothal has far more to teach a new generation about relationships - and fidelity, too. (Bel Mooney, Daily Mail)

For Kate and William, their engagement has profound national significance. They will help form our collective imagination. They are now part of what we are as a nation, how we define ourselves as individuals. (Peter Oborne, Daily Telegraph)

As somebody whose business it is to study the human heart.. (Bel Mooney, Daily Mail - she actually wrote those words)

Today we are wiser and perhaps more humane. The unrealistic expectations that destroyed Charles and Diana have gone. (Peter Oborne, Daily Telegraph - he's playing a blinder)

It is rare these days that we glimpse broad sunlit uplands, but this is one such moment. (Daily Telegraph editorial - sweet fucking Jesus)

And the winner is (obviously)...

Diana, the bride at every royal funeral and the mourner at every royal wedding, was present in more than just the engagement ring which sat so heavily on the hand of this young woman who must now walk a mile in her bloodied shoes, on a road leading who knows where. (Julie Burchill, The Independent)
And the worst thing? People are paid to write this tripe...

Labels: , , ,

9 Comments:

At 2:56 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, how wonderful!

Do you think Kate should wear her hair up or down?

 
At 3:46 pm , Blogger deadaccount. said...

You cannot fathom the immensity of the fuck I do not give.

 
At 4:06 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh come on now, why so angry?

I think an up do is more regal but down will be prettier. Down, with lots of curls, or do you think straight would be better?

What do you think TNL?

I would go with the hair down with lots and lots of curls and fullness.

How about colors? It will be a spring/summer wedding. Pastels, light pinks and blues or something bold, loud, brash, 'in your face' like a fuschia or a limee green.

I think the former for the Royal family, the latter is too American.

 
At 4:41 pm , Anonymous Michael Fowke said...

Bel Mooney didn't write those words! No one would, surely?!

 
At 4:42 pm , Anonymous remi online said...

oh yeah that's great news..too bad i don't care about that guy...

 
At 5:05 pm , Blogger DJ Flagship said...

"They will help form our collective imagination."

Yeah, too right! How will the Daily Express manage to fit Diana, women in burqas, and our new royal couple all in the front page!?!?!?!

 
At 5:28 pm , Anonymous mirseven said...

Reading this is embarrassing for real journalists

 
At 9:16 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon. Up or down long or short curly or straight or just as it is...You sound just like the fucking Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee

 
At 1:18 pm , Blogger Anthony Trew said...

I couldn't agree with you more.

See my blog on the issue...

http://anthonytrew.blogspot.com/2010/11/royal-engagementwedding-so-what.html

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home