Friday, November 24, 2006

"...like a whore in a brothel..."

Young “Hug a Husky” Cameron sells his party further down the river for a couple of extra votes from the kind of people who probably vote Liberal owing to their utter inability to commit to one of the two parties capable of winning power. And the fact that they teach Geography in the local comprehensive and have leather patches on the arms of their tweed jackets.

Abandoning the fundamental principles of the Conservative party, Cameron announces that poverty is relative, not absolute. Which, as all right thinking people know, is complete and total arse. Poverty is relative. It is the likes of that monkey cunt Polly Toynbee. And as Tories we would always ignore her. Oh, wait, not anymore

Let’s go back to fundamentals – we are Conservatives, we believe in equality of opportunity, not outcome. The latter idea is a socialist idea, the opposite of what a Conservative should believe in. Absolute poverty is a moral disgrace, relative poverty is not. Relative poverty is a by product of a competitive society. Competitive societies do well, those that are not competitive, like the Soviet Union, fold under the weight of their own self-deception and hypocrisy.

Put simply, if everyone in society earns a million, the person on £999,999 is not poor. Not when compared to the people of Darfur. They are actually quite prosperous. They may be poor relative to their neighbours, but not compared to those who live in actual poverty. And yes, this is a theoretical argument, but actually any debate about relative and absolute poverty has to be theoretical.

This is another shameless headline grab, Cameron again showing himself to be a touchy-feely, lovable wee scamp who you are happy to vote for. For those who like their politics transparently vacuous, Cameron must be a dream come true. For those who prefer some sort of ideological commitment or beliefs behind their politicians, Cameron represents the slow, lingering death of politics in this country.

Cameron would probably allow a group of drunken sailors to rape his own grandmother in order to gain a bit more of the central ground. He is like Blair magnified tenfold – everything is about the pursuit of power, everything is about appearing non-descript and non-threatening. Political principle has not only been abandoned, it has been clubbed to death like a baby seal and buried in a shallow grave somewhere. He sits in CCHQ, his legs spread, like a whore in a brothel, waiting to sell himself for any one who offers a vote.

UKIP beckons.

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

At 4:50 pm , Blogger Boggart Blogger said...

As one who is a Green because of his complete and utter inability to commit to any of the three parties certain to abuse power whenever they get hold of it (I suppose we should make that four parties now as Blairs hypocrisy and CAmeron's ineptitude will certainly put the BNP in the driving seat in some councils) I think you make some good points but confuse real conservatism with Thatherism which is a synonym for Blairism.
So are Cameron's New Conservatives really Old Blairites or New Toynbeeites?Because they certainly ain't Conservatives, a species last sighted in 1976 and assumed extinct.

BTW open up your comments a bit more. You'll get a much bigger boost if I link from my Greenteeth blog at blog.co.uk that from my blogger one (coz blogger is owned by google and I hate google.)

Ian Thorpe
http://greenteeth.blog.co.uk

 
At 7:41 pm , Blogger towcestarian said...

Mr Strangeness

Just found you via Tory pimp Dale.

You are saying what everyone in the centre right is thinking, and todays 35 hr week nonsense will not be good for your health.

However, I would caution against UKIP who have a serious brand image problem (too much nationalism and not enough libertarianism and economics).

As a child of '77 I am recommending DIY politics as the answer to the loss of a secure political home. Get some mates together set up your own party and stand against your local conservative candidate. As the great Verity said, "do something destructive, not passive".

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home