Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Predicting the Opinion of Political History

This proved, somewhat unexpectedly, to be a very interesting documentary.

In a sense, I know very little about the Wilson/Heath years. I mean, I know the basic outline of what happened, if only because it provides some of the context for contemporary politics. But for me, the Wilson/Heath years (and the Callaghan administration) is part of the dour, drear post-war consensus era – that dull time when politics ground to a halt because the main parties pretty much agreed on everything. The programme did little to change my opinion of this era, but it did reframe it in a way that I hadn’t considered before through making it a duel between two of Britain’s least compelling Prime Ministers. It’s an interesting way of looking at politics between the mid-sixties and the mid-seventies.

And it did leave me wondering how the current political era will ultimately be viewed when similar documentaries are made in the future. I mean, in a sense it is easy to write the history of the Nu Labour years as it has two defining characteristics (ignoring the obvious ones like spin, mendacity and crushing incompetence). You can sum up the Nu Labour years by referencing the illegal and pointless war in Iraq at the same time as talking about the Blair-Brown rivalry. Unlike the Wilson/Heath years you don’t really need to mention whoever was in opposition. But what about the current era? How will the first year of the coalition be remembered?

I suspect that it will be remembered as the time when politics – or at least politicians and political commentators – went a little mad and forgot that the main party in government was the Tories rather than the Liberal Democrats. It will be about how the opposition party decided to fight Britain’s third party rather than the first party, and how the pointless chunterings of a second-rate politician like Vince Cable became front page news. And I rather suspect that historians will be incredulous as to the extent to which Nick Clegg became a Teflon coating for David Cameron. Above all, though, I think that this era could be framed around the question of why the Labour party allowed the Tories to coast to a real general election victory under the vacuous and utterly pointless Ed Miliband…

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

At 2:30 pm , Anonymous Single Acts of Tyranny said...

Oddly enough I saw it to and the parallels between now and then are clear. I fear we are in for a re-run of the 1970's

 
At 8:46 pm , Blogger James Higham said...

And it did leave me wondering how the current political era will ultimately be viewed when similar documentaries are made in the future.

Years of Treason?

 
At 12:03 am , Anonymous Andrew Zalotocky said...

We are rapidly heading towards an energy crisis. The coalition is betting our future on "renewable" energy sources like wind power that don't actually work. Whatever else this government may do, the historical account will mostly focus on black-outs, economic collapse, and the civil unrest that will follow. When the lights go out, so will everything else.

 
At 6:07 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 6:08 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Andrew,

Excellent observation

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home