Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Dan Hodges, Ed Miliband and a Chronic Lack of Choice

I do enjoy some of the articles written by Dan Hodges over at The New Statesman - the ones slating Ed Miliband, obviously. Miliband Minor has few critics as persistent as Hodges. His articles on the failing and flailing Labour leader are filled with gems such as this one:
Liam Byrne has presented Ed Miliband with a chance to begin to define his leadership. If he takes it, it could be a turning point. If he doesn't, it may represent one final, missed opportunity.
I think Hodges is often spot on in his analysis of the flaws of the lesser Miliband. However there is a problem in that Hodges clearly has an agenda of his own - since he was a key supporter of Miliband Major's bid for the Labour leadership. And this is what, in a sense, makes his articles even more fun - because the comments descend to the level of internecine-Labour party conflict, with some defending the indefensible (i.e. Ed Miliband) at the same time as (quite rightly, on some levels) accusing Hodges of being motivated mainly by sour grapes.

But the point is that Hodges' scribblings accurately represent the big problem that faced Labour when they replaced Brown and, arguably, still faces them today should they choose to do what is necessary and bin the Ed. That problem is the complete lack of choice when it coems to potential leadership candidates. Had Miliband Major been elected then there would be someone who supported his brother's campaign belly-aching on a weekly basis in The New Statesman about the failings of David as Leader of the Opposition. Neither of the Miliband leaders are inspirational in any way, shape or form - including the lost Miliband, Andy Burnham. Ed Balls is just plain vile, while Diane Abbott remains a joke. No matter who won the Labour leadership election last year, all would be struggling now as Labour leader. Furthermore, if there were to be a new contest right now, it is difficult to imagine a more inspirational line-up. The party hasn't reinvigorated itself in opposition; rather, it still doesn't seem to understand that it needs to reinvigorate itself at all.

So keep on sniping away at Ed Miliband, Dan. But at some point you're going to have to face up to the fact that your chosen candidate wasn't any better, and that the problems with the party you support run deeper than the fool who happens to be running that party at the moment.

Labels: , , , ,

2 Comments:

At 5:03 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree Milli minor looks doomed and wholly unconvincing. To some extent this is due to his abnormal, sort of alien weirdness. Also there is the recognition amongst some pepple anyway, that Osborne is doing the bare minimum in terms of cuts to the state (ie none, the pace of growth is just slowing) and there really isn't anything else to tax, so what would Labour really do differently.

Having effectively excused himself from the fray, I think Milli mahor has made a big mistake. He may fancy he can swan in and take over the leadership when junior flunks it, but I am not so sure. Those in the front libe will always be better placed than those picking up chunky "lecture fees" and so I just wonder of Balls might win next time.

I also agree with you, Balls would be worse than Milli minor, but I couldn't see them changing riders a third time before the next election. And with the tory/liberal farce churning out ever more failed nonsense, the time is ripe as never before for a breakthrough party.

 
At 8:06 am , Anonymous Timac said...

The problem with Labour is not just that they have few if any inspirational leaders but more that they have no alternative vision for the country. This is mainly due to the fact that there is no more than a rizla between them and the coalition. I read somewhere that they should court the anti-immigration, anti-europe vote but the chunk of society for who these sorts of policies matter blame Labour for them and are unlikely to forgive them anytime soon.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home