Saturday, April 30, 2011

Doctor Who: Day of the Moon

Oh. My. My oh my. That was good. In fact, that was more than good. Actually, I'd go so far as to say that was very good. Exceptionally good, if you will.

*Pauses for a moment to open a dictionary of superlatives*

So, what did I like about this superb adventure? Well, firstly, the fact that it opened so well. A neat trick that Moffat has done time and time again, but to have what you expect the second episode of this story to consist of dealt with and subverted before the opening credits is just great. I love the idea of the Doctor using the idea of the Pandorica to his own advantage - no longer a prison so much as a bit of privacy.

And doesn't the Doctor look great with a beard? No? Oh. Maybe that's just me looking to justify my own preference for having a beard at all times.

Then we move forward, and learn more about the Doctor's plan to stop the Silence. And it is worth pausing for a moment, particularly as we consider the moments in the children's home, to consider just how close this story came to being a horror movie. I can imagine that, if I was a child, this would have freaked me out. But more on how children would respond to this sort of episode later.

Inbetween, you have scares, banter, and one of the most sympathetic uses of Nixon in popular culture that I have ever seen. It is nice that he wasn't portrayed as one of the monsters; it is also nice that the Doctor played his part in creating the Watergate scandal through the suggestion of taping everything that happens in the Oval Office (although, in reality, that was the suggestion of Lyndon B Johnson. Then again, was he one of the Silence...?)

And Rory - poor Rory! Never quite knows whether his wife wants him or the guy with the floppy hair. Of course, the episode played with that as well - and it's nice that the Doctor and Amy care about the man who believes he is the gooseberry in their relationship. But the Pond pregnancy - what to make of that?

But to the resolution of the story. It was nice that a number of elements across the story came together to form a way of stopping the Silence. It was also nice that the Doctor - as he tends to do nowadays - gave them the chance to run before he stopped them. And this takes me back to my point about the kids who watch the show - yeah, the plot is quite complex. But I think most kids will get that the way in which you defeat the monster you cannot see is to film 'em and stick 'em on TV.

Of course, they'll be some who object to this story. Some who object as it doesn't answer all of the questions posed by the first episode (although given the number of questions opened by that episode, it would take the best part of a season to answer all of those questions - as I suspect it will). Others will object to what they see as the grafting of a progressive agenda onto the programme - I won't ruin the surprise unless you've seen it, but the reaction of Nixon in the show is both spot on and a good representation of those with a limited view of adults living together.

In short, this was not the best Doctor Who story - nor, arguably, the best that the current show-runner has written. But it was clever, controlled, and able to leave enough questions open to keep the overall story running for a good long while yet. And it also stands as a startling testament of its author to throw a genuine curveball toward even the most experienced of fans.

That girl. At the end. Y'know, the one regenerating. What the fuck is that all about?

Labels: , , ,

7 Comments:

At 2:10 am , Blogger MU said...

I nearly choked to death on a takeaway king prawn at the unreality of that propaganda being shoved down my throat. It exposes the vile contempt the BBC has for both blacks and gays, pretending the former are just white people with a coat of paint and devoid of any significant differences that would make such a pairing highly unlikely, and the latter umbiquitiously marxist drones with no ethnonationalist cultural roots to white Britain.

I know I'm almost completely alone on the gay/right front, but nonetheless, that took the piss and the biscuit. It's a shame, how the talent behind such an otherwise enjoyable show is dragged into totalitarian neomarxist murk. I'm not sure if I'll be able to stomach that sort of thing again without tuning out for good.

 
At 9:29 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

I have to say that I think you are both over-reacting and quite, quite wrong. There is nothing in the programme that shows contempt for blacks and/or for gays. In fact, it was a smart and clever way to point to the discrimination that black people and homosexual people would have experienced in Nixon's America (and still experience today - on both sides of the Atlantic).

It also wasn't propaganda. It was a reasonably striking moment in an episode filled with striking moments and much action. Had the episode been purely about homosexuality and ethnicity then you might have a point; as it stands, you're simply wrong on the propaganda issue.

And careful with your terminology. There is nothing neomarxist about highlighting difference in people. In fact, quite the opposite is true. Likewise with totalitatarian - that's about swallowing difference whole, not making people aware of it and of the discrimination that minorities have experienced.

By all means tune out, but this does rather remind me of the sort of hysterical reaction that man had who kicked in his TV because the Sex Pistols swore on it.

 
At 9:47 am , Blogger Pavlov's Cat said...

I may be being slow or missed something.
But I didn't get the point of 'The Silence' their whole 'raison d'etre' as it were.
"We have been here since fire and the wheel" Doing what exactly? Stealing food from fidges?

 
At 10:12 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

I suspect we haven't heard the last of the Silence. Partly because of all the unanswered questions - such as why were they building a TARDIS? And how does a little girl - apparently a Time Lady - fit into their plans?

 
At 12:35 pm , Blogger Pavlov's Cat said...

there's a good deconstruction of the episode over at io9 What do we know about Doctor Who’s mysterious new arch-nemesis?

 
At 2:43 am , Blogger MU said...

I'm pretty sure it was a point made in favour of perceived non-difference against discrimination.. when I'm in favour of the freedom to discriminate on private property, always.

Anyhow, I guess our conversation goes to show libertarianism is a broad church. I'll be reading your next pieces.

NWS.

 
At 7:04 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

I don't think it was making a point about that at all. Anyway, part of having the freedom of speech is to allow others to disagree with your (or anyone else's) discriminatory position(s). Besides, the FBI is (and was) a public organisation (funded by the public, run by the government, supporting the public), so your point wouldn't apply here. Quite simply, this isn't about private property.

TNL

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home