Saturday, June 05, 2010

Doctor Who: Vincent and the Doctor

Doctor Who has always loved depicting its hero meeting famous historical figures - something that has become much more prevalent since the series returned in 2005. He's met Charles Dickens, Queen Victoria, William Shakespeare, Agatha Christie and, most recently, Winston Churchill. And the series hasn't shied away from showing the darker side to some of these characters - in particular, Charles Dickens' loneliness because of his fraught relationship with his family and Agatha Christie's hurt at her husband's betrayal were important to those stories. Yet all of the historical figures met by the Doctor on screen tend to be those for whom things can get better. We know Churchill will win the war; we know that Victoria will become one of the most famous British monarchs of all time, we know Christie will fall in love again and so on.

Which is what makes tonight's celebrity historical figure such a departure for the show.

There is no way in which it can be avoided - despite his celebrity today, Vincent van Gogh led a miserable life that ended devastated by apparent failure. Tonight, the Doctor met - on prime time Saturday evening television - a man who struggled with mental illness all his life, mutilated himself, and ultimately ended up taking his own life. It requires a very different type of story to deal with van Gogh effectively, and balancing the darker side to the van Gogh story with the needs to provide early Saturday evening entertainment on BBC 1 is no mean feat.

And they did it with considerable aplomb. Vincent was presented as a tormented man, even at one point lying on his bed sobbing as the world rejected him once again. The show did not duck the depression that so blighted the artist. And it also took a moment to show how suspicious people can be of mental illness, and how intolerant people can be of those suffering. In this respect, this may yet prove to be one of the most important Doctor Who stories of all time. It tackled a taboo subject on prime time TV, and did so with considerable sensitivity and intelligence.

Yet it wasn't all solely about misery - there was much humour on offer as well. Vincent's over the top flirtation with Amy was amusing, the banter about bow-ties was nice and we saw a far lighter side to the Eleventh Doctor's personality than we have seen to date. And a more sensitive side too. When he comforted Amy in the museum at the end of the epsiode, he showed a genuine compassion for his companion - which is reassuring, since he has been far less affectionate towards Pond than the Tenth Doctor was to all of his companions.

But - make no mistake about this - it was Vincent who was the star of tonight's episode. The monster was a sub-plot, a side show that enabled the production team to look at someone who had a strange and troubled life, but managed to produce genuine masterpieces. The fact that Tony Curran was able to play the role so convincingly was essential, but this is proof positive that if you are going to deal with a historical figure, then you should put them centre stage. Churchill shouldn't have played second fiddle to the newer, fatter Daleks - he should have been at the core of his episode. Just as Vincent was the heart and the backbone of Vincent and the Doctor.

To some extent, this story messed with the format of Doctor Who, but that is perhaps what made it so distinct and so successful. The last two episodes were Doctor Who by the numbers whereas this... this was bold, clever, funny, sad and above all unexpected. It is often stated that Doctor Who has the most flexible format of any TV show, and I'd agree. But it rarely tries to truly challenge that format. It rarely properly stretches it. Tonight, it did. It took a long dead artist, and made him and his brilliant but troubled world into prime time entertainment that everyone could enjoy.

Ladies and gentlemen, this was Doctor Who at its very best.

Labels: , ,

6 Comments:

At 11:32 pm , Blogger Jim said...

I’m delighted to be able to agree wholeheartedly with that review! For me, easily the best episode of this series, and nice to see nuanced, fully-drawn characterisation for a change. This could easily have been rather a horrid exercise in historical guest star-ism (and I admit I was a bit dubious about that from the trailer) but it turned out as anything but. As a portrayal of overwhelming creativity inextricably bound together with mental illness (an issue which closely touches someone very, very dear to me) it was quite superb, and the fact that nothing changed Van Gogh’s eventual tragedy was – sadly – absolutely bang on.

Interesting to see Matt Smith being a very successful Doctor when someone gives him good material to work with; in fact, excellent performances all round, Bill Nighy’s cameo being, for me, the diamond amongst several gems. Mr Picky vaguely wishes that the sunflowers had been dedicated to Amy in French (or possibly Dutch, as apparently they were both from some previously unknown Caledonian-Dutch sub-group…!) and can’t quite stop himself from cocking an eyebrow at the over-mawkish music when Vincent visited his work in the 2010 d’Orsay. But hey. It was a great episode, and it’s a pleasure to be able to write that!

Also… no tacked-on crack. For which I was deeply grateful.

 
At 10:15 am , Blogger ted said...

I see the Royal Mint is issuing a coin to mark 70 years since Chuchill became PM. Oddly the coin has a quote from Anita Roddick. Choosing to have a quote from anyone other than Churchill on the coin seems a weird choice. One of the greatest PMs commemorated with a quote from a shopkeeper?

 
At 10:45 am , Blogger TonyF said...

Definitely the best episode so far. I really felt sympathy for all the protagonists. It wasn't comfortable viewing, but Dr Who shouldn't be. Vincent was portrayed by Tony Curran brilliantly. As you say the 'monster' was almost a side show, but it worked well on the 'less is more' principle.

 
At 9:50 am , Blogger Nemonymous said...

The monster was a representative of Hieronymous Bosch in a Van Gogh painting. The whole production (beautifully set, e.g. within van Gogh's own studio) was highly, deeply, emotionally, often absurdly, logical. Without question, a significant high point in the Dr Who canon since I started watching the series in 1963.

It was the archetypical Van Gogh, if not the real one...

Poignant as well as rumbustiously Whovian.

(Pignant was what VVG put in his paints before eating them).

Acting brilliant, including the regulars, but especially Bill Nighy (unusually for him) and the actor who played Vincent (Tony Curran).

 
At 6:37 pm , Anonymous Call of the Wendigo said...

I have to admit I've not exactly been gripped by most of this season but I really liked this ep. It's good to see the show demonstrating a bit of ambition again.

 
At 6:40 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone else notice the missing picture? At the end, when the Doctor takes Van Gogh to the museum, Van Gogh stops for a moment to look at a empty picture frame on the wall, and then the Doctor tugs him on. I'm trying to figure out what picture was in there, but I'm not sure we get to find out. As far as the new season, I'm somewhere in-between loving it and hating it. I don't like how it seems the Doctor is becoming dumb. For example, he didn't figure out the way to save both the humans and the whale in The Beast Below, in Victory of the Daleks he didn't think of trying love as the human emotion to stop the bomb, also he didn't notice the one headed statues not being two headed or in The Time of Angels, in The Hungry Earth he didn't realize the kid was missing until the mom spoke up, and the Doctor didn't catch the missing picture in Vincent And The Doctor. But I'm hoping it's part of a plot, and that he will stop being dense soon. Also the plot of the episodes just don't seem to have the right flare that they did with David Tennant, but I'm not sure if that's because of the script or the acting. I think I miss David's flare of emotion he had, cause it doesn't feel like Matt Smith is a bad actor. Anyways, this episode seems good, but it's missing that wonderful "Oh YES, the Doctor shoots and scores" feeling. That's my viewpoint, at least.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home