Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Too Fat to be a Foster Father

A gent has been told he cannot adopt because, frankly, he’s just too fat. The council said:

"I am writing to confirm that we are unable to progress an application from you at this time. This is due to the concerns that the medical advisers have expressed regarding Mr Hall's weight. I have discussed this with our medical adviser... who considers that it is important to alter lifestyle, diet and exercise in a sustainable way so that any weight reduction can be maintained in the long term.”
It may seem a tad arbitrary that the same state that left Baby P with his mother and let Fred and Rose West be foster parents to several children would also dismiss a man from being a foster parent for being fat. That said, both Central and Local government are not well known for the thoughtful implementation of policy, and their decisions do tend to be arbitrary choices made around draconian yet flawed procedures.

Plus, this guy isn’t just fat. He is huge. I believe the official term is morbidly obese. Now, I’m not doctor, as regular readers of this blog will know. However, terms such as morbid and obese are never good. And this fella isn’t just carrying round a couple of extra pounds – he literally ate all the pies. And pasties. And pizzas.

Now, I’m not going to turn this post into a stream of fat jokes. So I’m not going to say this guy should be known as Fatty Mc Fat Fat Fat Fat, or call him Chunks O’Lard. Likewise, I’m not going to ask “whatever happened to his chin?” Nor am I going to say that, given how fat he is, he could intimidate whales and probably eat the Isle of Wight in one sitting. No, such comments just aren’t helpful.

What I would say is that, from a Libertarian perspective, it is tempting to rally behind this Fatmeister General – sorry, sorry, man – because it could be a case of a one man being browbeaten by the insensitive, bureaucratic state. Then again, we also need to take into account another central tenet of Libertarianism – the potent doctrine of personal responsibility. So I’d say this guy that if he really, really wants to adopt a child and give that child a loving home, he should take some responsibility for himself and shed some of his weight. Because it won’t just be to for his benefit, but also for the child he wants to adopt. And for his wife, who could be left a widow because of his size. We could shout about the state over this issue; equally, we could tell this guy to get off his huge arse and do something about the situation he finds himself in.

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 2:03 pm , Blogger Milena said...

I say we take kids away from biological parents who are "too fat" as well. At least let's be consistent, shall we?

I don't agree with your take on this one.

 
At 2:31 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

*Shrugs*

My take on this one is ambivalent. Compared to all the shitty reasons why the state leaves kids with parents, denying a potential parent a foster child because he needs to cut down on his porklife is jarringly obtuse to say the least.

On the flipside, this dude can do something about it by shedding a few stone. And not being able to have a foster child should work as a fucking good incentive.

It is one of those scenarios where I struggle to have too much sympathy with either side.

TNL

 
At 3:32 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The dangers of obesity have actually been grossly overstated and shouldn't in my view be the basis of any public policy; certainly not one on fostering. The Obesity Myth by Paul Campos (also published as The Diet Myth is good on the health issues, and Tipping the Scales of Justice by Sondra Solovay addresses the legal/policy issues as well as mentioning a few health studies that aren't picked up by Campos. For a regular blog fix on these issues, complete with debunking of virtually every media story on the subject, Junkfood Science is brilliant.

 
At 11:23 pm , Blogger banned said...

All the stats show that inmates, sorry, Service Users, of local authority childrens homes tend to achieve little at school, gravitate toward crime, drugs and prostitution before dying early in gaol.
Having forced the closure of most religeon based adopting agencies ( who declined to offer up their charges to perverts ) local authorities have become almost the sole adoption provider.
As an adoptee ( not via LA ) I regard it as outrageous that they are allowed to foist their view of political correctness against the overiding need to find an adpotive family a.s.a.p. which is in the best interests of the child concerned.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home