Saturday, October 01, 2011

Doctor Who: The Wedding of River Song

Now, there are certain very dramatic things that a writer can do in their show. Killing off the lead character is certainly one. Especially if that happens in the opening episode of the series, swiftly followed by a slow countdown to that actually happening within the overall narrative. And the drama is only intensified if it is a lead character of a show that has been running for 48 years with that same lead character at the heart of it (albeit played by different actors of varying levels of talent). As openings go, the murder of the Doctor on the side of Lake Silencio is a pretty impressive way to open up a season of Doctor Who. It does also make the season finale very difficult to write, and to pull off in a way that will convince even just some of the viewers, let alone all of them. So, how did Moffat get on with it all, then?

First up, you have to admire the ambition of this episode. To create a universe of static time, where Area 52 is installed by the USA in a pyramid, where Churchill has become and remains Caesar (and spends at least some time dancing with Cleopatra), and where an unexpectedly alive Doctor is a bearded soothsayer imprisoned in the Tower of London requires a pretty hyperactive imagination. Of course, sometimes ambition doesn't quite pay off in Doctor Who - if only in terms of the realisation, as evidenced here by the hot-air balloon Minis flying across London at the start of this episode. They looked very cartoon-like; so much so that it was slightly distracting. Yeah, we know they are not real, but do they really have to look that unreal? But overall the attempt to create an alternate universe worked well forever existing in the same second was nice, and a brilliant concept to boot. It was nice to see Charles Dickens talking about his next Christmas Special, and if we are going to have a massive info-dump throughout about half of the episode, then why not have it as a conversation between the Doctor and Winston Churchill?

This was also a relatively complicated narrative. While I believe even the most casual of viewers will have picked up on what was going on and followed the story if they were so inclined, the dual narratives - of the Doctor trying to save himself at the same time as River ruining his plans by trying to save him as well - was much more complicated than your standard RTD season finale. It was also nice how the stories dovetailed at the end, and we were given the Doctor back - after he asked a favour from the Teselecta rather than just walking moodily away. Furthermore, it is also good that the Doctor, as far as his enemies are concerned, died - therefore there can be no more getting his enemies to flee by reading books or by getting them to trawl their visual memory banks. This story leaves the Doctor as an unknown (except to his friends) mad man with a box - just the way the whole thing began.

It was also good to see Rory threatened with death but then being saved by his wife before he got wiped out (again). It was also nice that the script acknowledged that he keeps on dying. It would be even nicer if this drew a line under the whole Rory dies all the time thing. Let's not have episodes ending with the apparent death of Mr Pond. Unless, y'know, he actually does die.

And the moment when the Doctor decided he should go to face his destiny was brilliant, even if it did bring a tear to my eye. I thought that Brigadier Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart would just vanish from the series, never to be heard of again. But after the death of the man who played him for decades, the show made the decision to let the Doctor know that one of his oldest and most loyal friends had also passed away. But the Brigadier never forgot the Doctor. He was always there, waiting for his mad old alien friend, with a glass of brandy. A wonderful little moment, played brilliantly by Smith, and a fitting tribute to Nicholas Courtney. I hope they find a way to do something as nice for the late Elisabeth Sladen.

But I'm skirting the issue here. There was much to enjoy, but was it the way in which the Doctor died but didn't ultimately satisfying? Well, no. Then again, it never could be. You cannot kill off your lead character and then not have killed him off without some sort of cop-out clause in your script. But here the episode did not, at least, do too badly. At least it wasn't obvious idea of the Flesh Doctor being killed on the beach; the use of the Teselecta was, at least for me, slightly more surprising. And since the Resurrection of the Doctor was always going to be a bit of a cop out, it is better that it was a slightly unexpected cop-out rather than the obvious one.

And there were other problems too. Not least the fact that Madame Kovarian and (in particular)the Silence were underused. Look, the Silence are a great enemy, Mr Moffat. Give them time to shine. Please, please, please can we have an episode next year where they are placed centre stage? Not just afterthoughts and the partial motive power to your overall narrative?

And while we're on the subject of the next season, let's try to tone down the scope of the threat a little bit. Last season, the whole of the universe was at stake in the finale. This season, the whole of time was decaying. What next? Is there any way to raise the stakes for the next season finale (which may well be the last stand of the Eleventh Doctor?) Well, yes, but it involves more of a threat to the Doctor and company rather than everything else there has ever been ever. The Caves of Androzani is consistently voted one of the best Doctor Who stories of all time, yet its scope is really rather small. Some soldiers, a corrupt politician, a disfigured madman in fetish wear and the Doctor and Peri (not forgetting the very unconvincing monster). No threat to the universe, just a little local trouble that could have lethal consequences for both of the then leads of the show. I'd like to see Moffat doing something like that. And I'd also like to see him doing something spooky again. Because while The Wedding of River Song was a breathless roller-coaster of an episode, it was only the awesome physical presence (as opposed to anything they said or did) of the Silence and the pit of flesh-eating skulls that could send a shiver up the spine. We hear a lot about the darkness of Moffat-era Who. Fine, it is darker than the RTD era, and most of those that preceded it. But let's make sure it is scary as well.

But overall, I feel immensely satisfied by the way this season ended. Not the best episode that the series has, or will, ever produce(d), to be sure. But a good finale that tied up enough of the loose ends to leave me, at the very least, feeling positive about the whole thing, but with enough up in the air to make me desperately excited to see what happens next.

And the question was, of course, "Doctor Who?" It has been the one asked for damn near half a century now, and again I'm excited to see where all this is going as we head towards that fiftieth anniversary and the Fall of the Eleventh...

Labels: , , ,

17 Comments:

At 12:20 am , Anonymous JonP said...

I enjoyed it, but i think more because it's become very comic book-y - all catch phrases and in-jokes - rather than being a good story (not that it was bad). The characters seem to have become more important/central than the plot; but it worked and was fun (IMO) so no complaints there.

 
At 8:50 am , Blogger Mark Wadsworth said...

"It was also nice that the script acknowledged that he keeps on dying."

Crikey, I didn't even notice Rory getting killed (again), let alone them explaining it away.

 
At 10:34 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

He wasn't actually killed this time, but as the Silence approached to off him with their electric, phallic fingers they said something along the lines of "you're always dying, this time die properly/for one last time". Then Amy came up and blew them all away.

 
At 11:32 am , Anonymous Jonathan said...

Was this a good use of 13 episodes? Clues on how the Doctor could survive were aplenty - the following could have been killed instead of the actual Doctor: the flesh doctor, the Teselata (sp?), alternative Doctor from the Roman narrative? (Still not sure which timeline Rory is from :-) )

So 13 episodes spent on that - and it was only in the last episode we see the Doctor asking them (Teselata) for help.

Secondly, River Song is meant to be living her life in reverse - so she knows the Doctor's future. So surely she knows that the Doctor will survive the lake side shooting? So she doesn't need to "not shoot" and cause the fabric of time to fall apart?

We now know that the Silence wanted to kill the Doctor so that he didn't cause some upset at some other place (didn't catch the proper name - something about the 11th Division?) But if the Doctor is going to cause the Silence to fall, surely that too is a "fixed point" in time?

So the "flesh" were introduced so Amy's baby could be stolen; and the Teselata so that they could help the Doctor.

Oh and when River Song implied she would be there when the Doctor was at his highest and he would fall to his lowest, the impression was that the kidnapping of the baby was the Doctor's lowest point - but surely his death was his lowest point (?)

IMHO the series has lost some of its edge and become a little too much like an American action packed series.

Regards

 
At 12:01 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

Yes, I think it was a good use of 13 episodes. If anything, I think it should have been spread out a bit more, though. There was precious little time to let the themes develop before we were hit with another revelation. Frankly, there was two seasons worth of story in this one season - it would have been nice to see this across 26 episodes rather than 13 (not least so we could have had more episodes not dedicated to the overall story arc).

Of course it is all opinion, and your opinion clearly differs from mine, but I think Doctor Who now has an edge that was largely missing in the often lazy and simplistic RTD era. Yeah, the risks Moffat takes do not always pay off, but enough of them do. Plus I admire his ambition to do something other that bring back the Daleks or the Master for the season finale.

TNL

 
At 11:49 pm , Blogger Stacy said...

I think I enjoyed series 6 more than series 5. (Although 5 has a few of my all-time favorite Who episodes.) I know a lot of people have been complaining about the complex, arc storylines and how dark it has been getting, but I love it! And the finale - of course - was epic! I mean, nothing's perfect and I had some problems with it, but I loved it all the same. I've never felt this giddy watching a season finale since the first season of Lost (or maybe The Big Bang, if we're talking Who)! Cannot wait for more Matt Smith-Stephen Moffat Who! And I totally agree: this series has an edge, and has been taking so many chances, that I just can't help but adore it. Nothing's perfect, but this era of Doctor Who has definitely come close for me.

 
At 12:31 am , Blogger Jim said...

If you ask me, that was the best episode that Moffat has written since he became showrunner. This series (and its story arc) has had a lot of problems (some which which remain unresolved) but the conclusion was coherent, well-structured (at last!) and did about the best job I can imagine of tying the arc off satisfyingly. I could write a lot more - and probably will at some point!

 
At 11:39 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

Blimey! Jim liked it... That was certainly not one of my predictions.

Unsurprisingly I think you're right, though. This was a coherent, but not completely conclusive, end to the story arc which has dominated the best part of the last two seasons. It is also something of a reboot; the Doctor is no longer a legend that can inspire fear across the universe because he is, in theory, dead. He'll have to work a little bit harder moving forward...

TNL

 
At 6:19 pm , Anonymous Andrew said...

It's all very well saying that the death of the Doctor means that he can not use his infamy to frighten people but they all know he is a time traveller. He could just be at a point in his lifespan pre-death.

That said I was a little disappointed in the episode. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoyed it, and it brought a logical end to the series. It just didn't match the all in bonkersness I expect from a series finale of Doctor Who. We still do not know who is behind the Silence. We didn't get to find out what was in the Doctor's room in the hotel.

I suppose it was similar in some ways to The Big Bang last year; a more cerebral end to the year. The Big Bang did at least follow an episode which saw 99.999% of the universe destroyed, one of the Doctor's companions killed, another be trapped in an exploding TARDIS and the last turn our to be an Auton in disguise. Not to mention guest appearances from Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans, Silurians, Uncle Tom Cobley and all. To some extent it would have made more sense to have this episode straight after A Good Man goes to War and Let's Kill Hitler.

I guess I have been a little negative about this episode (even though it was by a country mile the best thing on television all weekend (unless you count Friday's repeat of Closing Time)). I certainly didn't think I would miss the RTD style season ending but I would have liked a little more of the over the top, lots of explosions style ending.

That said I can't wait to find out the answer to The Question

 
At 6:37 pm , Blogger SeekMocha said...

Sorry, but using the Teselecta robot as a stand-in for the doctor at Lake Silencio was a pretty lame deus ex machina method for solving the Doctor's death dilemma. Not even very original, because the idea of using a robot substitute to avoid certain death goes back to Superman comics in the 50s & 60s. Also, if the Doctor's death at Silencio represented a "fixed moment in time," I would assume that it's the vast importance of the actual Doctor's death that makes that a fixed moment. Substituting a walking mannikin for the Doctor is not something that will generate the power required to create a fixed moment.

On another note, I must say that posing "Doctor Who?" as the question that must never be answered is a VERY interesting plot twist. I'm hoping that Moffat will resolve that plot point with more satisfaction than the was done for the Doctor's death.

And, I hope to see the Doctor and River Song on some adventures together!

 
At 5:15 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

So, SeekMocha, how would you have saved the Doctor? And please make sure that whatever plot you come up with can please every fan everywhere...

The point is not that the Teselecta was the most original or most convincing thing ever to happen to the show, but rather that it was a bit more original and therefore interesting than the Doctor being saved through using his Flesh duplicate. Furthermore, it is a fixed point in time that the Doctor died by the shores of Lake Silencio, and as far as his enemies believe he did. The vessel that was "killed" contained the Doctor, after all...

TNL

 
At 9:53 am , Blogger Jim said...

Indeed. I think that we are left to assume that the fixed point related to the general perception of the Doctor's death, rather than its actuality. The teselecta solution does place the doctor physically there, in nexus with the semi-timelord River (presumably a necessary criterion to 'create' the fixed point - otherwise why not just shoot him anywhere?) and also creates the necessary perception. It just about works theoretically (in a way that the flesh doctor wouldn't have worked - the presence of a 'doctor in a doctor suit' as the script describes it IS a rather different thing from a stand-in turning up). But whilst it CAN be rationalised that way, I do think that it would have been better if the script had made that point explicit. Further, in order for the Doctor's behaviour to make sense, one has to make a further rationalisation that it was the Doctor finally twigging - at the very last minute - that the perception was the crucial element rather than his actual death that allowed him to find a get-out clause (whilst for the previous 200 years he had been mournfully assuming that there was no way out). The teselecta solution is imperfect - one assumes that the tiny people all know that he's not dead for a start - but it does almost work. Now, whilst I'm all in favour of making the viewer think, I do feel that the script should address issues like this and explain them. We should see the Doctor's eureka moment and understand what it is. There's a fine line between deep plotting that requires some effort from the viewer to understand on the one hand, and a script that doesn't make sense unless the viewer invents some stuff to solve the plotholes on the other. To my mind this was just the right side of that line - but only just!

 
At 12:32 am , Blogger Kristin_Texas said...

I LOVED the finale. I'm still trying to get my mother to watch the episode.

My only question is how does River get sent to prison? When she "murdered" The Doctor, wasn't only Rory, Amy, and Future River present to actually witness it? (And at least one Silent, which Amy saw for a second).

On that lake we see a murder, then the burning of his body. There were no other witnesses in all that time, so could anyone prove that River did it? And even if they saw her do it, they would have seen older River there at the same time.

Kristin

 
At 8:49 am , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

And Canton Delaware. And the Teselecta and its crew. Plus Amy and Rory spend x amount of time believing that the Doctor is dead, some of which they are travelling in time and space. Perhaps they might have mentioned it?

But I think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned the Silent on the beach. They are the ones determined to kill the Doctor, and they are connected with the military religious types seen in The Time of Angels and Flesh and Stone. I'd imagine they mentioned it to someone...

 
At 8:16 am , Anonymous Jonathan said...

Yep lets give credit to Mr Moffat for using his imagination and giving us a huge story. Not only that the story it is so huge, it leaves us, the viewer, with questions/discussions etc. And let us not forget that some of our points may be answered - or not as they may be too minor compared with the bigger questions that will be answered.

I agree with TNL some of the stories could have been spread over two+ episodes in order to give the characters time to develop or for people like me to really understand what is happening. For instance I still don't understand when Amy became the flesh Amy - was it flesh Amy on the beach witnessing the death of the future Doctor?

Or if Amy, River and others can remember the alternative timeline (when time stood still - shouldn't that be the aternate still-line?), then doesn't that mean the whole population has become slightly confused (is this the real world - I thought I had a balloon car and I can't find where I left it).

When Matt Smith moves on from being the Doctor, the "final" Doctor will take over. Won't the Doctor's enemies note there is a new Doctor?

I'm hoping there will be answers. But I'm hoping for sensible character development and a little less focus on "who am I" but more on what the doctor does best - helping others. But who knows, I'm not sure what timeline I'm in.

Regards to all

 
At 10:52 pm , Blogger liminalD said...

Hi... new here, sorry to butt in.

I just have one point for Jonathan - a lot of people keep saying that there's only one Doctor to go, that the Twelfth will be the last... As I understand it, that's not the case. I believe it's twelve REGENERATIONS, which would be THIRTEEN Doctors in total, if that old rule even still applies.

I don't believe it does - the BBC aren't going to let some obscure old rule from twenty or thirty years ago finish off their most successful franchise - the only real question is going to be HOW they get around it. I think we've been given two possibilities already - if we take the 12 regeneration rule as something imposed by the Time Lords on themselves (which seems to be the explanation favoured by former-show-runner Russell T Davies), then arguably it no longer applies as they all got killed off in the Time War. In fact, I would argue that RTD got rid of them for precisely that reason - it may even have been a BBC stipulation in bringing the show back from the grave in 2005, a way to ensure an unending source of merchandising revenue, perhaps. Certainly one of the themes of the RTD era was that (in the words of Ood Sigma) "The story never ends."

The second option is the one that Moffat seems to be heading toward - the proposed but unrealised Cartmel Master Plan from the Seventh Doctor era. If you're unfamiliar with it, just Google it, but in a nutshell, the CMP is that the Doctor is more than just any old Time Lord, he's the Other, one of the three founders of Time Lord society alongside Rassilon and Omega and thus potentially immortal, an almost godlike figure. Moffat hints pretty strongly in 'The Wedding of River Song' that the Doctor knows a secret that must never be told, and that the secret is the answer to the question 'Doctor Who?' Certainly there's been plenty in series 5 and 6 to suggest this Doctor-as-God-solution, what with Omega symbols cropping up everywhere, Viking funereal rites, militant churches, monks, a 'Papal Mainframe' and tall scary aliens who seem to be a cheeky reference to Mormons.

I've rambled on and got away from the point that I was initially trying to make - sorry, I do that. But yeah, I think we're pretty much guaranteed to get more than 12 Doctors - I expect the Doctor's cheeky line to Clyde in The Sarah Jane Adventures serial 'Death of the Doctor' about being able to regenerate 507 times will prove nearer the mark :)

Cheers,

D.

 
At 1:31 pm , Blogger izzy said...

Jonathan- River and the Doctor's relationship is not always strictly in reverse. At the point where she doesn't kill him, she is relatively young and hasn't yet met an older version of the doctor.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home