Friday, September 30, 2011

The Wedding of River Song: Some Predictions

Some people love a bit of speculation when it comes to the next adventures of the nation’s favourite Time Lord. Others hate it. Some see it as ruining the surprise. Others see it as pointless geek speculation. Now, if you fall into the latter two camps, this post is not for you. Away you go until tomorrow, when (all being well) the review of The Wedding of River Song will arrive. But for all of those in the former camp, welcome to a bit of speculation about how one of the best seasons in the show’s history will be wrapped up.

First up, let’s do the easy bit. Rory and Amy will be back. Hell, they were even in the episode after the one that was meant to mark their departure from the TARDIS. And we’re going to see other familiar faces returning for the finale. River Song (obviously), Kovarian, the Silence and Winston Churchill. Oh, and at least one Dalek. That much can be gathered from the trailer. Charles Dickens will also be back.

What we have also seen a lot of is that footage of River Song wearing an eye patch, in the style of Madame Kovarian. Does this mean that River disguises herself as Kovarian? Or that she, in some way, becomes Kovarian? And in the prequel, soldiers are wearing the eye patches. Again, is there a reason for this? Does it perhaps help with the Silence in some way?

And we keep on hearing that “silence will fall when the question is asked”. Now, the idea that silence will fall can be interpreted in two ways. Firstly, it could mean that the world/universe fall silent, or fall to the silence. That’s probably the obvious way to take those words. But, there is another way – that the Silence will fall in the same way that the Roman Empire fell; in other words, this marks their last stand. Which then leads us to ask “what is the question?” Personally, I’ve spent a lot of the past few weeks thinking someone is going to ask the Doctor “who are you?” That’s a question that is as old as time (or the show, anyway). Now I suspect that the question could be, again addressed to the Doctor, “will you marry me?” After all, River is meant to be killing the Doctor – if she actually turns it on its head and proposes to him, that will end the schemes of the Silence pretty effectively.

On that note – it now seems almost certain that the impossible astronaut is River. Yet… I wouldn’t put it past Moffat to actually put someone else in that space suit. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is the Doctor in there. The Doctor killing the Doctor… to make his enemies, who have pursued him across time and space and done irreparable damage to so many people in the process, believe him to be dead. Can there be two different Doctors? Well, yeah – and ever since the ending to The Almost People I’ve been expecting the return of the Flesh Doctor (actually, the Almost Doctor sounds better than the Flesh Doctor…)

Of course, if it is the Almost Doctor being killed/replacing the Real Doctor, then I’ll probably be a bit disappointed. Then again, that is the biggest problem facing this episode – by killing off the lead character in the opening episode of this season, Moffat has made a rod for his own back. He’ll have to pull off something pretty astounding to avoid making at least some of the viewers feel cheated. Yet he is the king (at least in the world of Doctor Who) of involved plotting. I’d be surprised if he had entered into the idea of killing the Doctor without working out how to bring him back. If anyone can pull off something pretty bloody spectacular, it will be Moffat. And I’m very much looking forward to seeing what he has got to offer us.

And one final prediction? Lots of people will end up disappointed. Even if Moffat has written the single best episode of Doctor Who of all time, people will still find something to carp on about. Fine, that’s the nature of the beast. I just hope that people go into the episode with an open mind, and see what Moffat has in store for us. The general feeling should be one of excitement; not an expectation of disappointment.

Labels: , ,

5 Comments:

At 10:15 am , Blogger Pavlov's Cat said...

“silence will fall when the question is asked”

when I heard that I automatically thought of The Nine Billion Names of God

 
At 1:42 am , Blogger Jim said...

Jim’s predications (in which I will stick my neck out in the partial expectation of decapitation when we actually see the episode)…

1. I strongly suspect that the Doctor’s ‘death’ will not be the climax of the episode at all. It will quite possibly occur early on in the episode and will be the pivotal point that unlocks (or causes) something entirely new which we are not expecting.

2. The wildly eclectic elements which the trailers have revealed suggest two main possibilities to me. The more mundane is that there will be a LOT of flashbacks to ‘explain’ a deeper plot – Moffat has form in this regard. In fact I expect that such explicatory flashbacks will happen to some extent – but not to a very large extent. My guess is that some of these might relate to material from really quite a long time ago, most probably connected with River Song’s timeline. My more speculative guess would be that they might get as far back as ‘Flesh and Stone’ but not as far back as ‘Silence in the Library’.

3. However I also doubt that ‘flashbacking’ will be the main thrust of it. My preferred theory is that the thing-that-we’re-not-expecting will be a ‘collapse of time’ in which everything that ever happened will either be scrambled up in the wrong order, or will all be happening at once: hence Churchill, pterodactyls, and all the rest of it in the same episode. I think this for several reasons: (a) that’s what it looks like on the episode trailer (b) I remember that portentous voice in the trailer for the second half of the season, intoning ‘…something has happened to time…’ and I don’t think that we’ve seen that yet (c) last year Moffat collapsed the entire universe, so this year he’ll have to go for something else around the theme of time and space – and it won’t be something small, it’ll be something that Moffat can use the word ‘epic’ about in a smug voice (d) it’s a very Moffatstyle idea, as it gives him the chance to write something bonkers and (e) it provides a lurking, concealed re-set button which is going to get pressed – and which will in fact be a deus-ex-machina escape clause, but dressed up enough to make this plausibly deniable.

4. I have a nasty feeling that the expression ‘alternate timeline’ is going to appear at some point in order to resolve a lot of issues without having to explain them properly. I just hope that it’s not going to work along the lines of Pam’s dream in ‘Dallas'.

5. And in brief: many questions will be ‘answered’, but whether this will be satisfying is rather doubtful; quite a lot of this season will continue not to make sense because Moffat won’t bother to join the dots and will be hoping that we won’t notice; the whole thing will be an exemplar of the fizz-bang-wallop style, which will be a good laugh but shortly afterwards TNL and I will agree that it should have been a two-parter. Oh, and 'the question' will be a bit bathetic if and when it gets asked.

6. Finally: the last time I saw chess-playing and Vikings in the same episode, Fenric turned up – you know the one, that evil shape-shifting entity from the depths of time who wants to destroy the Doctor. Just saying.

 
At 3:11 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some great ideas!

 
At 11:54 am , Anonymous Andrew said...

Is it just me or are the rest of you feeling slightly less anticipation about the episode than usual. I'm not saying that I'm not looking forward to watching it, just that it has not felt as important an ending.

This could be because this is not the second part of an obvious two part story or that, by splitting the season, we have not had the same sort of sustained run.

I agree with Jim about the collapse of time being a likely event, possibly caused by the Doctor's death and I am intrigued as to what the wearing of an eye patch means (having seen some interesting preview photos)

As for the question, whilst the obvious ones are Will you marry me?, What is your name? and Who are you?, it would not surprise me if it was something as simple as What's the time?

 
At 1:53 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

I'd love it if Fenric turned up. But I suspect that would be too obtuse even for Moffat.

And "what is the time?" is a strong contender for the question since, as far as I understand, time will be standing still in this episode. There is also a large strand of pessmistic philosophy that argues what made us what we are is an awareness of time and, in particular, its passing. Although that's for another day...

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home