Monday, November 08, 2010

Whatever happened to Ed Miliband?

Y’know, I thought being Leader of the Opposition meant that you were supposed to lead, well, the opposition. Thus far, Ed Miliband's leadership had consisted of retiring from frontline politics to relative obscurity. Which is a bold strategy, but not likely to be a successful one given his current position. There are many types of Conservative leaders that Miliband could attempt to emulate; Iain Duncan Smith is not probably the best one though.

The reasons for his relative silence are something of a mystery. The coalition is doing many things that people find controversial – Miliband Minor’s response is to mutely shrug and wonder why people are looking at him with an expectation that he should say something.

But I do have a theory. Miliband Minor has managed to slip down one of the few remaining ideological cracks in the narrow consensus of modern British politics – he is lost somewhere between the centre ground (where everyone seems to want to be for reasons that frankly defy understanding) and the slightly left-of-centre. And the reason is simple – the ‘Red Ed’ tag. As soon as he had been announced as leader, he managed to get the tag ‘Red Ed’. He was tagged as the plaything of the Unions; a dangerous leftie throwback to the Labour party of the 1980’s. And that panicked him, and meant he was unable to position himself anywhere. He couldn’t be Nu Labour, because we seem to hate that brand now. And he can’t be left-of-centre without proving the cheap jibe of “Red Ed” completely correct. He’s got nowhere to go.

Of course, this wouldn’t be the case if he had a backbone. He could stay the course, and defend the Nu Labour brand, or he could be more the left-wing man many assumed he would be (and far closer to his father). But he doesn’t. Like most people in his generation in the political elite, he seems rather afraid that having political convictions will lead to difficult situations. You know, awkward stuff like having to defend his position. The sort of thing that politicians used to do as a matter of course, but now avoid like the plague..

But, while the “Red” tag was arguably cheap and has not necessarily been borne out by the Labour leader’s behaviour, it may yet prove to be one of the most effective nicknames given to a politician in recent years. It seems to be the root cause of the silence of the man who should be leading the opposition in our country.

Labels: , , , , ,

6 Comments:

At 8:05 am , Blogger Simon Fawthrop said...

Interesting.

If the problem is that he is scared to show any conviction and Labour lose the next election, especially by a wide margin, then Labour can only blame themselves. They demonised Thatcher for having conviction so the sight of chickens, home, roost will add to the schadenfreude.

 
At 10:44 am , Anonymous Timac said...

I have friends in the Labour party and it's not just Ed that's gone policy-lite at the moment. There is a huge silence from their ranks. They're really depressed at having lost the election and, it seems, the argument too. That is, the argument for the cuts and the value of a large patriarcal state.

Secondly, they feel (though haven't expressed it openly) that the Tories will hang themselves on their own. They think that when the cuts bite, people will naturally flock back to Labour and that when ideological splits occur within the coalition, Labour will be in an ideal position to capitalize. Me, I think that's wishful thinking and they're in denial. They're kinda enjoying wallowing. One of my Labour party friends has pretty much given up on politics altogether, which is a shame, becuase whilst we disagreed on many things, I miss my sparring partner.

 
At 10:50 am , Anonymous Timac said...

I meant paternalistic, not patriarchal

 
At 1:31 pm , Blogger DJ Flagship said...

Great post, TNL. I must say, I've been underwhelmed by Dead Ed's performance (and, yes, with most politicians, it is a performance). New Labour seem to think they have the inherent right of governing the country, which goes with what Timac said about them thinking that they'll naturally flock back alongside unpopularity and divisions around the coalition.

Good god, even American politics are becoming more diverse than ours. Christ!

 
At 8:59 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

"Dead Ed" - fucking brilliant! Love it!

 
At 11:19 pm , Anonymous Ed P said...

Poor Mildred, no safe ground for him. If Wool-arse lied, where does that leave the rest of them?
Watch out for Balls, repositioning himself ready for the Brutus moment.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home