Monday, November 01, 2010

Student Radicalism

Or rather, the lack thereof.

Once upon a time, and for a fleeting moment, students were genuinely radical and – in the case of France – actually looked, for one fleeting moment, like they could have a real impact on political history. Indeed, some Marxists – such as Herbert Marcuse – began to see students as the impetus for revolution rather than the proletariat. But that faded… until now, in this day and age, we have the spectre of student protests again. Not over war or discrimination in society, however, but rather over the amount that they have to pay in order to get their university education.

I’d imagine that some of the potential protestors – such as the socialists shouting “Stop the Tory Axemen!” on campus last week – see themselves as radicals, taking direct action and “fightin’ the power”!

In a sense, of course, they are right. They are fighting the government, and the right to protest is something I absolutely support. But I do think that those involved in the protests should be under no illusion what they are doing. They are not being radical, they are being fundamentally conservative. By definition, conservatives resist change – and what are these protests about? Conserving the status quo. Resisting change. Nothing radical about that.

And what motivates these conservative protests? Self-interest. Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with self-interest – it motivates vast swathes of politics, and always has done. But this is a world away of protesting to end the Vietnam War, or for civil rights.

Following on from this, you can see just how student radicalism is at least wasting away, if not a terminal case. Look at what has happened over the past few years – the police killing people, the attempts to bring in extended periods of detention, the bailing out of failed banks with public money (that could have been spent, among other things, further education) and so on – all met with nary a mutter from the majority of students in this country. Yet come a potential increase in the costs of education or a reduction in the amount of money some institutions have to spend, and the sleeping student behemoth awakens.

So by all means, have your protests, make your voices heard – that is your right as participants in a democracy. But please don’t pretend that you’re being anything other than self-interested conservatives.

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 10:14 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its not new,selling acid in the early 70's I went into Liverpool Uni and got told students were too conservative these days for drugs.10 years earlier,with John Lennon I sold out in 5 minutes.

 
At 10:24 am , Blogger Timdog said...

Great post.

Thing is, students are tossers, and I say this knowing full well that 10 years ago I was both a student and a tosser. They (I) moan(ed) about inconsequential bullshit, they (I) think (thought) it should all be free and then they (I) fuck(ed) around getting pissed anyway.

However, when they start protesting it all gets a bit earnest and Student Gwant, and they must be laughed at and derided at every opportunity.

 
At 1:37 pm , Blogger Simon Fawthrop said...

You think US students weren't motivated by self interest when in came to Vietnam? I beg to differ, the draft was the biggest motivator in those protests.

I'm also willing to bet that Iraq and Afghanistan would have been short sharp affairs if the US still had the Draft.

 
At 6:59 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

SimonF,

Sure, I understand what you're saying - although the French students may have been protesting (in part) about Vietnam, they weren't afraid of the draft as France had pulled out of that conflict 14 years before.

TNL

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home