Sunday, April 05, 2009

Wolverine Vs The Pirates

For as long as I can remember, part of the joys of buying any sort of DVD or video was to be forced to sit through trite, crass and stupid piracy ads. You know the sort of advert I'm talking about; one that has bad acting, cliched situations and the unsubtle implication that by buying a pirated DVD, CD or video you are funding every sort of crime from drug related theft through to international global terrorism. And they all have that extra warning that purchasing pirated product will damage future production. 

I've never quite believed that taping someone else's CD or cadging a ripped off DVD from a seller in the pub is quite going to have such a devastating impact on the industries mentioned. However, now we have an example where we can actually see what impact piracy can have on the film. The leaking of X-Men Origins: Wolverine could dent that film's box office returns. 

I say "could", because we have no hard and fast proof that it actually will. The fact that it is on the internet doesn't means that vast hordes of people will rush to download it. For a start, not everyone will have the technological ability to do so. Likewise, the leaked copy is not the final cut, meaning you'll be missing out on how the film is actually supposed to look if you watch the pirate copy. Finally, there'll be more than a few people who actually want to go see this film in the cinema. For the experience of being at the cinema, and seeing what is actually an action movie on the big screen rather than your PC monitor. 

Nonetheless, if this picture isn't a big hit, then I can see the studio blaming this leak for it. Whereas the truth maybe slightly different. After all, this is the fourth film in a franchise that is nearly a decade old. The previous film the franchise was far from great, and everything about this origin story reeks of flogging a dead horse. So it is perfectly possible that if this film does fail, then that will have nothing to the piracy of it, but rather down to the quality of it. 

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 4:15 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your impression that one little copy of something can't hurt just goes to show that you are as clueless and ignorant as the worst pirate. There are hundreds of thousands of idiots like you thinking you aren't going to do financial harm by bootlegging. Fuck you, asshole. Your acceptance of pirating will bring down the industry one day and as such there will be no more tentpole films. If you can't afford to watch something then DON'T FUCKING WATCH IT.

 
At 4:34 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

Anonymong,

Grow up.

For a start, I never said that I would pirate anything. I simply said I was not sure about how much damage it might do. But you are the fucking naive one if you think that piracy is going to destroy the movie or music industry. It has been going on for years, with no real affect. You should accept piracy; it exists. That is a fucking fact, you dickhead.

Let's take a real life example, shall we? The pilot episode of the new series of Doctor Who was leaked online. Did that stop millions of people from watching it? Did it bollocks.

Are you an employee within the film industry, by any chance? Otherwise, where does your strident, impotent and pointless rage come from? As a heads up, I'd suggest you read the fucking posts you comment on before you open your gob. This post is questioning whether the leak will affect this film adversely. Your comment suggests that it is advocating piracy. I assume you read the title and then made up the rest of the post yourself. Cretin.

To summarise: go fuck yourself.

 
At 5:19 pm , Blogger SteveShark said...

'Tentpole films' - not Richard Timney's preferred viewing as I first thought - but big budget films from a proven franchise that keep a studio solvent when less populist films don't gross very well.
Can we be sure that they're a good thing in that case?
Surely, if studios put more effort into all their films then they wouldn't need to keep on churning out sequel after sequel - with diminishing artistic returns?

 
At 9:31 am , Blogger banned said...

If I were to ,allegedly, download quite a few full length movies each week I would then buy the real thing from Amazon if I liked it but, if I didn't, the, alleged, download would prevent me from being sold a pup by overzealous marketing people.

I remember how the record industry used to bitch about 'bootlegs' but the clever ones used the underground to creat demand by urban myth.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home