Monday, December 27, 2010

Gordon Brown: Loser, Not Hero, Of The Year

Been a while since I last did a good fisk. This article is practically begging for it - a piece of pap trying to make Gordon Brown - who this year, more than any other, made himself clearly stand out as a total loser - into a hero. Let's go take a look:
Unlike the current leader of the Labour party, I cannot imagine Gordon Brown being a tolerable person to make a snowman with.
I don't want to make a snowman with any party leader of any party ever. If I did, then both Miliband Minor and Brown the Cunt would be pretty low down on the list. But sorry, what is the point about this idea of making snowmen with party leaders? Is there one?
He would fuss about the precise placement of the carrot nose and pebble eyes, possibly employing a ruler and spirit-level, and fret that this was not an appropriate use of our intellectual resources.
Still struggling to see the point of this snowman shit. But anwyay, Brown'd probably chuck a mobile phone at your face for not agreeing with him that snowman should look exactly like him (which is like a fatter Richard Nixon, fact fans).
But, and herein lies the rub, I have never felt the need to imagine the potential for cold weather fun with the head of the party I'm supporting, simply to feel confident in their potential to lead it to power.
Then why the fuck mention the whole snowman thing? Jesus. Try reading back your own article next time. Just so it makes some sort of fucking sense, as opposed to just being padded out fawning and bullshit.
Brown, it has often been observed, was born into the wrong era. Paralysingly ill-suited to the territory of 24/7 performative politics, his stock would have been valued considerably higher in the olden days when moral compass, staunch resolve and attention to detail were as important as the ability to crack a genuine smile on YouTube is now. But Gordon Brown, as in so many other areas, had no such luck.
What moral compass, staunch resolve and attention to detail? None of this was shown in Brown's failed time in Number 10. He was a shallow opportunist, determined to cling to his unelected and undeserved position. His time in power is summed up by his odious slogan of "British Jobs For British Workers". He would say anything to stay in power; the problem (for him) was that he was shit at saying it.
He did not, of course, lead his party to power in May, but down to the doldrums of defeat which may well last much longer than this country deserves. And yet, though his inability to capture public confidence was personal as much as it was circumstantial, it is his dignity in defeat that makes him my hero of 2010. His exit from Downing Street was touchingly humble. No amount of nippy accounts of "22 days in May" can deflect from the power of Guardian photographer Martin Argles's shots of Brown with his family in their final moments at Number 10.
I'd rather read a million accounts of those 22 days in May than gawp at a photo of Brown strutting down the street like he is some sort of genuinely historical figure. After all, those 22 days - for better or for worse - gave us our incumbent government. Whereas that shot was of a man leaving a building he should have vacated days before. And he appears, for all the world, to be dragging his family with him.
Returning with them to Fife, he has embraced life below the radar as a constituency MP, surfacing only recently to offer his characteristically comprehensive thoughts on the potential for global financial restructuring in his book Beyond the Crash, serialised here.
Oh, please. Brown went from being Prime Minister to being an MP who could not be fucked to work for the constituents who elected him. He did nothing after being turfed out of Downing Street except write his book which has, to a large extent, been a failure - a dead weight on those bookstores that elected to stock it.
When he denounced Tory cuts as "immoral" and "economic vandalism" in an article for the Mirror last Saturday, he only echoed the sentiments of the thousands of protesters who had taken to the high streets that day to express their outrage at the national plague of tax avoidance.
Thousands of protestors in a country of 60 million? What a man of the people Gordon Brown must be. Particularly since he was just rehashing the muted attack lines of his replacement as Labour leader.
In his passionate belief in international co-operation to temper national insecurity, we see beyond Brown the caricature to Brown the believer.
Never seen this belief in international cooperation. What I've seen is Gordon Brown the believer in his own (undeserved) entitlement to power.
The country may not have wanted him as a fatally flawed leader, but it needs him now as a quiet economic hero.
In what way is the man who nearly bankrupted this country - and forced these cuts on the coalition - a fucking economic hero? And in what way is he quiet - this man who once blithely boasted that he had ended boom and bust? Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ, the last thing we need is to hear more from Gordon Brown. His time in power was an absolute fucking disaster, and his incompetence and malign policies will hurt this country for many years to come.

Labels: , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 4:44 pm , Blogger Prodicus said...

Lovely.

If what that author is trying to say is that before the 24/7 news/bloggery era an incompetent, ill-informed, economically illiterate, over-promoted, doctrinaire, partisan, megalomaniacal, insecure, arrested-development, anally-retentive, semi-paranoid sociopath might have got away with abuse of office and intimidation and might thereby have been better able to fool press and people, they have a point, so thank God for 24//7 news/bloggery.

 
At 6:41 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gordon wasn't on your xmas card list I presume?

odious little man, I wouldn't have trusted him to feed the cat let alone be PM

 
At 12:54 am , Anonymous Andrew Zalotocky said...

It is absurd to suggest that anyone was "born into the wrong era". You are born when you are born, and if you cannot adapt to the circumstances of your era then that's your problem not the fault of the era.

It is true to say that a person with Brown's attitudes would have done better in certain periods of history. His messianic belief in central planning would have been considered highly advanced in the 1940s, had he been a Labour MP at the time. But to have been a notable figure in the Labour Party of that time he would have had to have been born into a working class family around the year 1900, and who can say how such a person might have turned out?

The bottom line: taking modern figures out of their historical context is futile and stupid. Also, most journalists are lazy and ignorant.

 
At 12:48 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

it's like shooting fish in a barrel. With a really, *really* big gun.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home