Wednesday, June 30, 2010

A Radical Way to Reduce the Prison Population

It is a curious thing when you have a Tory calling for a reduced prison population and a former Labour Home Secretary - in The Daily Mail of all places - arguing that prison works. I guess, if nothing else, that this just goes to show how lost the Labour party has become: some of its leading lights are now on the right of the incumbent Con-Dem government. But hey ho - that's Labour's problem, not mine.

But since this is now clearly on the agenda, I have an idea that could substantially reduce the prison population. It is a radical (if you are deeply unimaginative or an unthinking reader of tabloid newspapers) policy, and one many people won't like. But it is this - reduce the prison population by legalising drugs.

From that point on, you are going to be sending fewer people to prison - users, addicts and pushers. If drugs cease to be criminal, then those involved with them cease to automatically be seen as criminal as well. So fewer people will end up going to prison.

And, of course, there are other benefits as well. The Treasury would make more money through taxing drugs. Addicts might be more willing to come forward and seek treatment since admitting to a drug problem would no longer be the same as admitting to criminal activity. Drug related crime would also fall. Furthermore, we wouldn't be in the ludicrous position as we are now where we send drug addicts into confinement in places rife with drugs - namely, prisons. So to Ken Clarke - and any other politician who wants to reduce the prison population - I say do it. Legalise drugs, and then not only will the numbers of those in prison start going down very quickly, but a whole host of other good things could happen as well.

Of course, this won't happen; no professional politician would dare. But one of the reasons why drugs remain such an emotive topic in this country is because of the media inspired frenzy around them, which provokes an unthinking level of rage and fear in many people as soon as the topic of drugs comes up. But that is something that politicians could rectify if they were courageous enough. There are clear benefits to legalising drugs - now all we need is a politician with the backbone to start making the case for legalisation.

Labels: , , ,

13 Comments:

At 5:39 pm , Blogger JohnRS said...

Portugal did this a few years ago and saw exactly the benefits you describe.

Chances of one of our brave troughers in the House of Conmen suggesting somthing similar - as you say, zero!

 
At 6:18 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about, in addition to your own suggestion, jail sentences for crimes of violence only. All other crimes to be dealt with by asset sequestration or fines.

There, we have reduced the prison population dramatically with just two simple changes

 
At 8:19 pm , Blogger The Nameless Libertarian said...

Anoymous - that would depend on your definition of violence.

TNL

 
At 8:53 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"How about, in addition to your own suggestion, jail sentences for crimes of violence only. All other crimes to be dealt with by asset sequestration or fines."

What do you do with people with no assets who refuse to pay fines?

 
At 9:38 pm , Anonymous Mr Civil Libertarian said...

May I suggest having a gander at the Vienna Declaration?
http://www.viennadeclaration.com/about-the-declaration.html

 
At 7:07 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous asked 'What do you do with people with no assets who refuse to pay fines?'

Convicted non-violent criminals could be hired by private or cooperative enterprises as a cheap source of labour. They would work until they had earned enough money to compensate their victim. This would have the effect of attracting companies that have relocated to China back to the UK.

The state should not be allowed to run these concerns or else they would quickly degenerate into work camps.

 
At 1:11 pm , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Convicted non-violent criminals could be hired by private or cooperative enterprises as a cheap source of labour. They would work until they had earned enough money to compensate their victim."

So what do you do when they refuse to do these jobs?

 
At 8:01 pm , Anonymous auralay said...

Not just me then? I always thought this was such an obvious answer that I must be totaly dumb not to see the flaws!

 
At 8:45 pm , Anonymous Nigel Sedgwick said...

How do you train a dog?

Best regards

 
At 12:01 am , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said, with regard to my previous post, 'So what do you do when they refuse to do these jobs?'

In a free-market system, an individual would have insurance cover, just as motorists do today. If an individual were convicted of an offence, his/her insurer would compensate the victim and come to an arrangement with the perpetrator to recover the money. If the perpetrator refused to pay his debt, he would become a bad security risk and would lose his cover. The individual would have a choice: either he voluntarily agrees to pay the penalty or else he becomes uninsurable - an outlaw in effect. Most people, I think, would rather pay up than lose their insurance status, and consquently their jobs, ability to take on a mortgage/rent a house, take out a loan, etc, etc.

Of course, there would be repeat-offenders who could or would not cooperate, and in those cases a jail term alongside violent prisoners might be necessary, as a last resort.

It would be a more satisfactory arrangement if non-violent criminals could make restitution to their victims, rather than be automatically banged up at everybody's expense, including, quite possibly, the victim's.

 
At 10:18 pm , Blogger TonyF said...

Hang them, cheap and re-usable. Then after the politicians, hang the criminals.

 
At 10:41 pm , Blogger SadButMadLad said...

"Most people, I think, would rather pay up than lose their insurance status, and consquently their jobs, ability to take on a mortgage/rent a house, take out a loan, etc, etc. "

Most people, I think, wouldn't give a damn. Most people in such situations haven't got much to lose. Those that do home something to lose will find the benefits system there to catch them.

 
At 10:47 pm , Blogger SadButMadLad said...

"Portugal did this a few years ago and saw exactly the benefits you describe."

Portugal only decriminalised the possesion of small quantities of drugs. Drug users can still get picked up by the police even with small amounts. However instead of jail, they are encouraged to visit a drug rehabilitation center. What the side effects of the Portugal experience is that it has cut down on HIV infections from less shared needles being used. Drugs overdoses have also fallen. Crimes caused by drug addicts stealing to feed their habit haven't fallen.

What Portugal is doing is spending money on drug treatment rather than drug enforcement.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home