However, one sentence does stand out in the article:
“The Tories have been in the lead for all but three months of the past two years, although they are well below the level of the Labour Opposition in the 1990s.”The question for me (originally posed via e-mail by the Moai) is why aren’t the Tories at the level of the Labour Opposition in the 1990s? I mean, the situation politically is similar – we have a grey faced former Chancellor replacing a once-popular, long serving Prime Minister. We have a fresh-faced, media savvy policy vacuum leading a resurgent opposition. And we have the Liberal Democrats eating each other like cannibals at a picnic. So why aren’t the Tories more ahead in the polls?
Well, it is the economy, stupid. By the mid 1990’s, the Tories had royally fucked the economy through the ERM debacle. And despite having worked to undermine the Tory led recovery (after 1992) systematically since becoming Chancellor, it is only now that the disastrous nature of Brown’s policies are becoming clear to the electorate as a whole. Brown based his economic policies on smoke and mirrors. Only now is the smoke clearing, and the mirrors are breaking.
Which is the scary thing. It is not a case of “things can only get better”; whilst Gordo clings to power, things may well get worse before they get any better. It is a terrifying thought, but the Tories might yet hit the dizzy heights of popularity of Labour in the 1990’s. But only once Gordon has taken our economy and flushed it completely down the toilet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Erm, there's no real comment policy other than "don't libel anyone" and "don't use the comment section to try to sell your products". If you do either, I will delete the comments without warning. Otherwise, you can pretty much write what you want.